By the end of the dialogue, it appears that neither side has succeeded in persuading the other, and yet this passage is unique in the larger work Thucydides gives us. How does this dramatized dialogue serve as a lens through which to interpret the History more broadly?

The Peloponnesian War was a conflict between two hegemonic powers in the Greek world, Athens and Sparta. What does “The Melian Dialogue” reveal about how such power struggles impact smaller and less powerful states or nations?

The Athenians show a callous, practical self-interest throughout the dialogue. Given that they would surely prefer a swift, diplomatic submission rather than a lengthy, expensive siege, would a more conciliatory approach have been more effective? Why or why not?