How do Charles Park and David Brower’s responses to the physical challenges of their journey in Part 1 reflect their respective philosophical positions on environmental conservation and resource extraction? How does McPhee use these differences to deepen the reader’s understanding of the fundamental conflict between industrial interests and environmental preservation?

Analyze how McPhee presents Brower and Park’s arguments regarding the implications of mining in the Glacier Peak Wilderness. Name at least three strategies of portraying the different positions the two men have. What effect do these rhetorical strategies have on the reading experience?

How do Park and Brower’s differing perspectives on the potential economic benefits versus the irreversible environmental impact of mining illustrate the broader tension between industrial development and conservation? Discuss the symbolism of their descent towards the Suiattle River in shaping the narrative’s exploration of this conflict.